security

A few days ago I was asked about the new full-body scanners that are being used at several airports, including BWI (Baltimore-Washington International). I'm a little embarrased to admit that, though I knew the scanners were being used, I didn't know the details. After all, one of the core readings in the CCT program (during my 1st year here, at least), was Jeffrey Rosen's "The Naked Crowd," and these new scanners are exactly what Rosen referred to as The Naked Machine.  Read More »

Author: 
Nicholas Proferes
Abstract: 
Networked devices present new dilemmas to the legal system. The use of these devices can challenge the preconceived notions of what is public and what is private. One might ask, do the same rules for monitoring traffic operations among public and private roads apply to monitoring a telecommunications infrastructure that is made up of public and private networks? Should wiretapping laws written to apply to telephone conversations apply to voice communications over an IP network? Does an individual’s right to privacy end when that person walks out his front door? Does he even have to leave his house, but instead just sign in online? Is surveillance the same thing as search and seizure? The rapid evolution of technical capabilities available in new technology is spurring more questions than answers. When courts are asked these types questions, they routinely have to answer based on law and regulation that was created with old technology in mind. This can and has led to legal challenges regarding the use of these technologies, and can further lead to a public mistrust of these networked devices and systems. This paper looks to explore the relationship between ubiquitous technologies today, the aging policy that is often used to explore and exploit it in the legal arena, and the concept of public trust.

On the sixth anniversary of September 11 several members of the print media and a representative from the National Security Archive gathered at American University to discuss "The Freedom of Press in a Post 9-11 Era." Washington D.C.'s public radio station, WAMU, has archived a recording of the discussion on their website.  Read More »

Author: 
Stephen Wanczyk
Abstract: 

The biggest threat to personal privacy in the near future might not come from massive government surveillance projects; instead, tiny technology will be implemented by diverse commercial, private, and public interests and will flood our environment with constant monitoring and omnipresent sensors. The promise of nanotechnology to achieve fantastic scientific goals is no longer limited to works of science fiction. ZDNet News, an Internet technology website and watchdog, lists Radio Frequency Identification chips (RFID) as one of the top new technologies to watch in 2003. This paper will detail the history and current context of electronic surveillance and will examine the role RFID systems may play in eroding personal privacy as they and other even more intelligent nanotechnologies become increasingly widespread.

Syndicate content Subscribe